Comments on: You’re Doing It Wrong: Hills Are NOT Harder Than Cycling On The Flat https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/ Bikepacking, Bicycle Touring, Equipment, Testing, Videos Wed, 27 Dec 2023 15:27:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Alee | CyclingAbout.com https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3765 Tue, 25 Jul 2017 01:37:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3765 In reply to crazydave789.

Maintaining cadence and using suitable gear ratios for the conditions are king. All the best with your fitness!

]]>
By: crazydave789 https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3686 Thu, 13 Jul 2017 15:27:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3686 I grew up a roadie in a hilly coastal town.where the aim is to maintain speed, this is why we power up them thar hills and its a hard habit to break. when I went back to cycling in my 20s-30s in a totally flat area I switched to using slicked up mountain bikes as they were stronger and kept that roadie mentality which was good to push the pain and build speed riding at night for the most part, I rode 2 inch tioga city slickers pumped solid with a girvin flex stem and gel saddle for comfort.

I did live somewhere relatively flat and suited to fast speeds. the first time I panniered up it was a marin palisades with blackburn racks and cannondale overland panniers to take the current Mrs crazydave to see some family. just over a 100 miles. My panniers and rack arrived at the local bike shop the day before so I had no time to get used to it and threw myself straight into the deep end with her behind on her new road bike unladen as she was only a wee 7 stone thing. 40 miles of flat then 60 miles of hills. being used to 30 mile fast legs it taught me to settle back and stay in the saddle and throw myself rather than the bike around as I was used to. I also learnt to pace it mainly because if I didn’t force feed her she would bonk out and I’d lose her so I dropped my speeds to a steady 14mph. if it wasn’t for her constant punctures from riding in the gutter all the time we would have stormed it but she did get plenty of rest. on the way back she got tyre liners and new tubes – and more hills.

Trying to get back into it at 47 now, still got the muscle definition from my younger days but they aren’t trained up so its slow going. and I’m back living in a hilly area so finding somewhere flat enough to get a good aerobic circuit going is proving hard. and I will have to get used to lower gears, settling back and concentrate on cadence. so thanks for the article it’s all interesting.
.

]]>
By: Brian Bassett https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3366 Mon, 01 May 2017 23:20:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3366 Adding a 750w BaFang motor teaches you this lesson quickly. It is difficult to dig in hard and pedal the bike faster, the motor compensates and you kind your going faster but still peddling at the same cadence and torque. I have never had to walk my bike up an incline and I am 59 years old. Biggest problem is I am not losing weight. It all becomes about the varying speed of the bike regardless of the incline…. up to a point.

]]>
By: Alee | CyclingAbout.com https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3284 Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:40:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3284 In reply to John M..

You’re not hopeless, you’re just going to have to work a little harder than some! But that’s ok, you’ll get fitter faster AND you’ll drop weight too.

]]>
By: Alee | CyclingAbout.com https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3283 Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:37:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3283 In reply to Youme.

I agree, you can easily modify your pedalling cadence with a little practice.

]]>
By: Youme https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3228 Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:39:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3228 In reply to John M..

I started four months ago. I thought my legs were going to fall off doing 70 rpm. Now I’m cruising around and looking down at the computer showing me doing 95-100 without even realizing it. It just happens the more you ride, the more your body adjusts. As for age, 57 is absolutely fine time to start cycling. As with everything as you get older, just need to be more careful. Listen to your body.

]]>
By: John M. https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3213 Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:59:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3213 So if I’m comprehending this correctly, I’m hopeless. The best fit I could find at a reasonable price for a beginner (who begins at 57?), was a 61cm frame Giant combination bike. 90 rpm? I thought 60 was high. Also 70k rider etc on the computations, I’m at least twice that and I want to carry baggage but as I’m overloaded as is think a trailer best. So I see the science, do my best to apply that to my thought processes and techniques, but honestly I can’t see me on anything steeper than a short 5% gradient

]]>
By: Phil https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3201 Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:14:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3201 I agree with pretty much everything except the rolling resistance comment. Sorry – this isn’t correct. The rolling resistance portion of the resistance to motion is mainly a function of mass x gravity x coefficient of rolling resistance of the tire. Speed does play a part, but the curve is generally very flat. The coefficient of rolling resistance of a tire is mainly a function of pressure, construction, tread, road surface and temperature.
The overall message, though, is absolutely on point. Power is power, gearing just gives you mechanical advantage, so for less torque at the crank you can produce the same power by spinning faster.

]]>
By: Alee | CyclingAbout.com https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3172 Mon, 03 Apr 2017 08:00:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3172 In reply to olee22.

– The Alfine 8 can handle a 1.9:1 drive ratio. So that’s a range of 27-84″ with 700x38c. Not good for much more than flat/undulated touring.
– The Rohloff range is fine for touring. With a 2.1:1 drive ratio, you will get 16-84″. That’s 40km/h at 100 RPM in the highest gear. You can tune it down to 1.9:1 if you need even lower climbing gears. It’s also worth noting that some people use a Schlumpf Drive or front derailleur in combination with a Rohloff to get more top-end gears.
– The Pinion has an exceptional gear range! You can set it up to achieve everything from 16-105″. That pretty much covers all bases for a touring bike.
– You can run whatever chainrings/cogs are available from Rohloff/Pinion, as long as you select a drive ratio that suits your riding.

]]>
By: olee22 https://www.cyclingabout.com/hills-are-not-harder-than-cycling-on-the-flat/#comment-3170 Sun, 02 Apr 2017 21:18:00 +0000 https://www.cyclingabout.com/?p=10644#comment-3170 I guess an Alfine 8 doesn’t cover enough range ro be good at both 25 km/h flat and uphill. Do you think it can?
A Rohloff 14 can have enough range?
Or better a Pinion 18?
What chainrings would you recommend for 700x38C for Rohloff 14 and Pinion 18?
I want to avoid derailleurs at all cost.
Thanks a lot!

]]>